William Shakespeare Hall

From ArchivesWiki
(Redirected from William Shakespeare Hall)
William Shakespeare Hall
(1825 – 1895)
Portrait taken c. 1870
Birth: 1825
Death: 1895
Parents: Sarah Theodosia Hall (née Branson)
    1793 – 17 February 1858
Henry Edward Hall
    1790–1859
Siblings: Laetitia Hester (née Hall)
    1822–1877
William Shakespeare Hall
    1825 – 1895
Theodosia Sophia Hester (née Hall)
    1827–1898
James Anderton Hall
    1829–1888
Edward Frank Hall
    1832–1886
Sarah Louisa Bracher (née Hall)
    b. 1819, England; d. 1910, Victoria, Australia
Henry Hastings Hall
    c1812–1879
Partners: Hannah Boyd Hall (née Lazenby)
    1849–1911
Children: Henry Ernest Hall
    1869–1941
Harold Aubrey Hall
    1871–1963
Joy Hannah Emma Margaret Clifton (née Hall)
    1876–1960
William Shakespeare Hall Jr.
    died in infancy, Cossack, 1878
Grace Hall
    died in infancy, 1875
Authority
control
Permalink: archives.org.au/WSH
Wikidata: Q8018316
Wikitree: Hall-22337
FamilySearch: LZW7-5LZ
Ancestry: 312115279515

Please see the following Wikipedia article for more coverage of this topic:
William Shakespeare Hall

If you have material to contribute, please consider adding it to Wikipedia rather than here, so more people can benefit.

From The Building of Jarmen Island Lighthouse, 1888 (published 1936):

“Shakey” Hall had a quarrel with another well-known settler named Fauntleroy, who did not take it seriously. However, when his dog had pups he named them all after the members of “Shakey’s” family—“William Shakespeare,” “Hannah,” “Aubrey,” “Ernest” and “Joy.” Everyone treated this as a joke, and took a delight in addressing each of these pups by their respective names. During Faumrtleroy’s life-time, “Shakey” was ignorant of this joke which Fauntleroy had played on him. After his death, he learned of it and waxed very wroth, declaring he would go to Roebourne, where Fauntleroy was buried, and defile his grave. Needless to say he never did.

Poor old “Shakey” came to an untimely end some years later. He was very fond of sea bathing and a strong swimmer. Early every morning, summer and winter, into the creek opposite his house he went. He was found face downwards in three feet of water, quite dead, evidently heart failure.


Two children lost

From History of Western Australia by W. B. Kimberley, Chapter 11 (p. 100). The children are presumed to be William Shakespeare Hall and James Anderton Hall.

On the 11th December, 1834, two children of Mr. Hall, on the Murray, went down to the sea-beach to watch some soldiers fishing. One returned home soon after noon, but the other lost his way in the bush. At four o'clock next morning Mr. Norcott, accompanied by two white men and the natives Migo and Mollydobbin, who were attached to the mounted police corps, went out in search of the child. They soon came upon his track along the beach to the northward. The Europeans were quickly nonplussed, for a fresh wind had covered up the track with sand. Not so the natives. Their practised eyes traced the boy's wanderings four miles along the beach, when they intimated that he had turned into the bush. They followed his movements with astonishing minuteness, and led the way into an almost impenetrable thicket, through which they had to crawl on hands and knees. Loose shifting sand lay on the clear spots amid the bush, and thus their task was fraught with the utmost difficulty.

After about an hour's time the beach was regained, for the boy had only made a circuit inland of 400 yards. There the track was again distinct, and for five more miles, with occasional turnings in and out of the bush, they traced the erratic steps of the poor lad. Eventually even the natives were momentarily at fault, for the boy had entered another thicket which it was almost impossible for them to penetrate. But presently they cried out "me meyal geena," meaning "I see the footmarks." Their progress was now watched with the intensest interest by the white men, who viewed with ever-increasing amazement their acute perception. Through a dense mass of matted bush they forced their curious way, and when Mr. Norcott began to despair of success, the natives inspired his confidence by holding up a cap which was known to belong to the child. Again the track led along the beach until some sand cliffs were reached, where the wanderer had gone to an elevated spot. The wind had entirely effaced all marks of his feet in the loose sand, and it was an anxious moment for the search party. Migo was not daunted. Descending the hill, he persisted in making a circuit at its base, and after a little time he fell in with the track. But even here sand had obliterated most of the footsteps, and for nearly two hours the natives alternately lost and refound them. The party had nearly given up all hope of recovering the child when Mollydobbin saw a track on the side of a deep ravine. The natives went down into the ravine and commenced hallooing, hoping that the child might be asleep in the bush. Next they had to penetrate bushes and thickets more dense than any previous ones, and once again they emerged on the beach. Observing by the tracks that the child had been there but recently they pushed on with great eagerness, and at a distance of about 300 yards were delighted and gratified to observe the boy lying asleep on the beach, his legs idly washed by the surf. Another hour and probably the child would have perished, for the tide was rapidly coming in. Mr. Norcott galloped up to him, and calling him by name, the boy awoke and instantly jumped up.

The joy and delight of the two natives are said to have been beyond description. They had walked for nearly twenty-two miles with their eyes constantly fixed on the ground for ten consecutive hours, and they evinced such great anxiety as to the little one's fate that Mr. Norcott says he could not but applaud the noble disposition of these two savages.


Tree

Diagrams error: no response received from remote service.

References